Don’t worry—it’s extinct! However, it’s insightful to see that ambō the long ō ending that is characteristic of Greek duals and dual-related adverbs: ἄμφω, δύω, κτλ.
The Essential AG: p.59, ftn.
Don’t worry—it’s extinct! However, it’s insightful to see that ambō the long ō ending that is characteristic of Greek duals and dual-related adverbs: ἄμφω, δύω, κτλ.
The Essential AG: p.59, ftn.
Normally, we can conceive that interclūdō (hold off) and prohibeō (prohibit) would take an accusative Person with an ablative Object (of separation).
However, verbs of of defending, prohibiting and protecting may also take the accusative Object and dative Person.
Verbs with this Construction:
Recall that interdīcō is an exception: taking dative+accusative or dative+ablative.
For more: http://wp.me/p2eimD-bl
The Essential AG: 364n2
interdīco, interdīcere, interdīxī, interdīctus: forbid
Interdīco (forbid) gets a note of it’s own in A&G because it’s case constructions have varied over time.
Exempla
*This was the standard formally for expressing ‘he is banished’
Also, I discovered during the construction of this post that ‘forbid’ is never the past tense of the English ‘forbid.’ It is usually ‘forbade’ and rarely ‘forbad.’ I hope I wasn’t the only person making this mistake… for 21 years…
The Essential AG: 365n1
Many Latin verbs display flexibility of case use. For instance, the following verbs will take either (a) accusative Person + dative Gift; or (b) dative Person + ablative Gift.
Exempla
The Essential AG: 364